At Mercer, we make a difference in the lives of more than million people every day by advancing their health, wealth, and careers. Companies that practice bottom-up leadership by investing in first-line leaders are able to do more with less, become more competitive, and attract and retain the people who will help them to remain so. This shift in mindset should not be underestimated.
Leadership works best as a partnership, with managers and direct reports working together toward achievement of company goals. It requires strong skills in goal setting, diagnosis, and matching for both manager and direct report. But most organizations only focus on one half of that partnering equation, says Susan Fowler, a senior consulting partner with The Ken Blanchard Companies.
Leadership is not a one-size-fits-all strategy. What works for one team might not work for another, and it's okay to experiment with or stray from traditional styles. In fact, there doesn't even have to be one person leading a team.
Everyone in the innovation blogosphere recognizes that innovation proceeds through two complementary modes: top down and bottom up. It is ambition-driven and implemented by senior leaders who organize the process from vision to reality. Bottom-up innovation, as illustrated by Google and the archetypal 3M Company, is fueled by the many ideas initiated by employees. It is driven by entrepreneurs and is supported by a top management emphasis on creativity and the development of a can-do culture.
You have to depend on those self leaders to make it happen. This mindset is a real shift in perspective for most individual contributors who come into a training not understanding the benefits of self leadership. Fowler explains that without the right mindset, individuals are less likely to embrace, learn, and apply the skills of Setting Goals, Diagnosis, and Matching getting an appropriate leadership stylewhich are taught later in the program.
By Everwise December 7, Creating an effective management culture has countless positive effects on your organization. There are generally two approaches to effective organizational management: top-down and bottom-up.
Traditional leadership is top-down - a position in a hierarchy, an ongoing role with responsibility for people. Bottom-up leadership is a one-off act of influence, such as when an employee convinces management to adopt a new product idea. Leadership shown bottom up is like green leadership.
Can leadership be shown bottom-up? How often have you influenced your boss to think or act differently? Is this not leadership shown by you to your boss? Because we normally think of leadership as a top-down role, the very idea of bottom-up leadership is nonsense.
While perusing hundreds of quotes about leadership, I came across three that I thought were particularly incisive:. He is the one that gets the people to do the greatest things. Do they strike a chord with you, too?
Advocates of either approach will tell you why theirs works best, and why the alternative is a disaster. But a mark of good leadership is knowing that few complex challenges ever come down to just choosing between two simple options. As an idea, bottom-up leadership emerged from the egalitarian ideals that swept the Western world in the 20th century. Even though the roots of those ideas have been around for over a generation, bottom-up leadership approaches are often presented as something new.